Disabled in America: Trapped, Excluded, Forgotten
Why 17 States Are Trying to Strip Disabled Americans of Their Last Legal Protections
By any measure of justice, the United States has failed disabled people. For all its talk of equality and freedom, this country has systematically neglected, exploited, and discarded its disabled citizens for generations. Even after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed in 1990 (!!!), it has been riddled with loopholes, exemptions, and weak enforcement that allow businesses, landlords, hospitals, and even public schools to remain inaccessible. And now, in 2025, we are watching as 17 Republican-led states are actively trying to dismantle even the minimal protections disabled Americans rely on.
This isn't just neglect—it’s a deliberate war on disabled people, a cold calculation by politicians and corporations who see accessibility as too expensive and human rights as optional. And the most chilling part? The legal attack these states are launching is aimed mainly at Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the law that ensures disabled children can even attend school and that hospitals cannot deny them care (DREDF).
The Coffman Chronicle is powered by YOU—no billionaires, no corporate overlords. Help us keep exposing the BS, delivering sharp insights, and keeping you informed.
For just $8 a month or $80 a year, you can fuel the fight and be part of the movement.
Not ready to subscribe? No worries, chaos loves company, and you're always welcome. But if you’re fired up to keep us loud, proud, and unfiltered, smash that subscribe button now!
Thirty Years of the ADA—and Disabled People Still Can’t Access Most of America
When the ADA was passed in 1990, it was hailed as a landmark victory recognizing that disabled Americans deserved equal access to public life. But the reality has never lived up to the promise. The ADA wasn’t passed out of goodwill but because of relentless activism. Disabled protesters crawled up the steps of the U.S. Capitol in the "Capitol Crawl," literally dragging their bodies to force Congress to act. Even then, businesses and conservative lawmakers fought against it, whining about “costs” as if equality was a privilege, not a right.
And they got their way. The ADA is filled with loopholes, exemptions, and enforcement failures, rendering it a weak, ineffective tool (SSA).
The ADA Does Not Even Apply to Most Private Spaces, Schools, or Healthcare Facilities
Most Americans assume that all businesses, schools, and hospitals are legally required to be ADA-compliant. That is a myth. The ADA only applies to public buildings like government offices, courthouses, and some forms of public transit (Statista).
Here’s what the ADA does NOT cover:
❌ Most private businesses—unless they are newly constructed or "easily modifiable."
❌ Older buildings—If built before 1992, they are exempt unless they undergo renovations.
❌ Private housing—The ADA does not cover apartment buildings, condos, and rental units.
❌ Religious institutions—Churches, synagogues, mosques, and religious-run schools are fully exempt (ED.gov).
❌ Many small businesses—If they can claim "financial hardship," they don’t have to comply.
❌ Some private hospitals and clinics—If they don’t take federal funding, the ADA may not apply.
Even in areas where the ADA technically applies, businesses, schools, and healthcare facilities often ignore the law because there is no active enforcement (SSA). No government agency regularly checks for violations, meaning accessibility is only enforced if a disabled person files a lawsuit—which is expensive, time-consuming, and places the burden of justice on those already struggling against an ableist society.
Public Schools Are Already Inaccessible—This Will Make It Worse
The ADA does apply to public schools, but enforcement is weak. Many schools have outdated, inaccessible buildings, and the ADA does not require costly retrofits unless a school is renovated.
Section 504 is the only reason many disabled children can access public education.
Without Section 504, schools could legally refuse accommodations, forcing children with disabilities out of mainstream classrooms.
Many private schools are already exempt from the ADA, and religious schools have no obligation to accommodate disabled students.
If Republican states succeed in gutting Section 504, disabled children will be locked out of education altogether.
Hospitals and Clinics Are Still Inaccessible—and It Could Get Worse
The ADA and Section 504 both apply to hospitals and clinics, but many facilities remain noncompliant.
Many hospitals still lack accessible exam tables, interpreters for deaf patients, or proper wheelchair access.
Private clinics often ignore ADA requirements unless they take federal funding.
Emergency rooms frequently fail to accommodate disabled patients, leading to medical discrimination.
With Republican states attacking Section 504, even federally funded hospitals could deny accommodations or reduce accessibility services without consequences.
Now, 17 Republican States Are Trying to Roll Back What Little Protections Exist
As if the current system wasn’t cruel enough, conservative states are now actively attacking Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which—unlike the ADA—actually enforces accessibility in public schools, hospitals, and health clinics (DREDF).
The lawsuit, filed by attorneys general from 17 Republican-led states, challenges Section 504 itself, which ensures that any school, hospital, or public service receiving federal funds must provide accessibility and accommodations for disabled people (The Lens NOLA).
If they win, the consequences will be catastrophic:
Public schools could legally deny education to disabled children (The Educator’s Room).
Hospitals and clinics could turn away disabled patients or refuse to provide accommodations (Disability Scoop).
Workplaces receiving federal funds could openly discriminate against disabled employees (Labor Employment Law Blog).
What makes this attack even more horrifying? These same states have some of the highest disabled populations in the country.
Alabama: 16.7% of residents are disabled.
Arkansas: 17.1% disabled.
Louisiana: 14.9% disabled.
Missouri, Montana, and Texas all have high disability rates as well.
These states are not just failing their disabled residents. They are actively working to strip away their rights. They argue that disability accommodations are too costly, too burdensome for businesses, and should be left to the states. In reality, this is an excuse to gut protections and let discrimination run rampant.
A Broken System That Keeps Disabled People in Poverty
Poverty and disability are inseparable in America by design. Disabled people are twice as likely to live in poverty, not because they can’t work but because the system is rigged against them. Social Security Disability (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are intentionally designed to keep recipients in financial hardship.
If you receive SSI, you’re not allowed to have more than $2,000 in savings. If you go over that amount, you lose your benefits.
If you get married, you can lose your disability benefits. The so-called "marriage penalty" forces disabled people to choose between love and survival.
The amount you receive is not enough to live on. In 2024, the max SSI payment is $943/month—well below the federal poverty line.
Instead of lifting disabled people out of poverty, our government actively punishes them for trying to save money, get married, or work a job.
Disability Rights Are STILL Not Fully Civil Rights in America
Despite the ADA, disabled people still do not have the same legal protections as other marginalized groups.
Disabled people are not considered a "suspect class" under the 14th Amendment, meaning courts allow states and businesses to discriminate if they have a “rational” reason.
The ADA is not as strong as the Civil Rights Act because it relies on disabled individuals to file lawsuits rather than government enforcement.
Housing and employment discrimination against disabled people is still common—and often legally allowed under loopholes.
Disabled Americans are still fighting for basic recognition under equal protection laws, decades after the ADA. Meanwhile, conservative states and businesses continue to chip away at what little rights they do have.
Other Developed Nations Do Better—So Why Does the U.S. Fail?
If you’re disabled in Germany, Canada, or Sweden, you get a higher standard of living, better healthcare, and stronger workplace protections than in the United States.
Germany requires businesses to hire disabled workers or pay fines. The U.S. does nothing.
Canada allows disabled people to work without losing their benefits and provides universal healthcare. The U.S. traps disabled people in medical debt.
Nordic countries offer free personal care assistance, fully accessible public spaces, and strong anti-discrimination enforcement. In contrast, the U.S. allows businesses to ignore the ADA unless someone sues them.
So why is the wealthiest country in the world so uniquely hostile to disabled people? Because American capitalism sees accessibility as an expense, not a right. The U.S. government has always treated disabled people as expendable, inconvenient, and undeserving of full participation in society.
This Is a War on Disabled People—And It Must Be Stopped
What’s happening in America isn’t just systemic ableism—it’s an outright war on disabled people. It’s a war waged through neglect, economic oppression, and legislative attacks. It’s a war that treats disabled lives as disposable, accessibility as a luxury, and equality as something we cannot afford.
Enough.
It took courageous activists crawling up the steps of the Capitol to force Congress to act in 1990. It is a tragedy and a stain on our history that it took that long for something so ineffective. It’s going to take that same anger, activism, and radical resistance to stop this new wave of attacks on disability rights.
Because if we don’t fight back, disabled Americans will be pushed further into poverty, exclusion, and legal second-class status.
And that is unacceptable. We must do better.
So... How many of these Republican led states have lawmakers and representatives that are MILLIONAIRES who DON'T HAVE TO WORRY About Medical Expenses, A Roof Over Their Heads and Food On Their Tables? CRUELTY Is The Name Of The Game and If You Have The Money, Honey...
Thank you for this. Of course this cruel
administration is trying to yank the few protections given to our disabled citizens. I had a chronically ill child and it took everything to get our local public school to give her accommodations.