9 Comments
User's avatar
Madam Power's avatar

Worked in the IT dept for Delaware federal court in early 2000's when the courts were still in the process of installing, configuring, and customizing their CM/ECF and PACER systems. At that time, it was all hands on deck for scanning all the old hard copies to pdf and linking them to correct case entries kept in the databases. Been an IT infrastructure engineer for two decades and found that most breaches occur because of the dependence on legacy systems and failure to keep systems updated in security. If federal courts are still using these legacy systems, I'm surprised a major breach hasn't happened earlier.

Tamie Swain πŸŒŠβœŒπŸ»πŸ–‡οΈ's avatar

And the reduction/elimination of federal anti-hacking and of proper data protections being ignored with the doggie team makes me even more suspicious. We reduced our protections and surveillance so of course someone will walk in.

Krysia Alexander's avatar

Truthfully I believe Palintir would be a good guess since their desire to own all information is currently evident. To protect whom? An orange person comes to mind, along with his cabinet, Musk, Black Rock, Vanguard, Banks, and other Billionaires. So many more, including other countries, we all know which ones.

Thanks for all the hard work and information.

Vanessa Behymer's avatar

Doge, anyone?

Greg Sandman's avatar

Gee. I wonder who might want to change documents in a sealed court file?

Marie Riverton's avatar

The same person who said the file doesn't exist, and if it does, it is definitely a hoax and was definitely created by the Dems?

Greg Sandman's avatar

I think you’re on to something!

Marie Riverton's avatar

Some people are saying....

Barbara Grinell's avatar

I didn’t know that.