First They Fired the Messenger. Now They’re Installing the Loyalist
The unprecedented same-day firing of the nation’s top labor statistician, and the nomination of a Project 2025 insider to replace her.
On the morning of August 1, 2025, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the July jobs report. The economy had added just 73,000 positions, far below forecasts, and earlier months were sharply revised downward, erasing more than a quarter-million jobs. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.2 percent.
Within hours, President Trump took to social media, accusing the BLS of “rigging” the numbers. By the end of that same day, Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed commissioner who oversaw the report, was out of a job. In modern history, no BLS commissioner has been fired mid-term over a dispute about data.
For decades, the job was protected by political norms. Janet Norwood, the longest-serving modern commissioner, held the post for twelve years under three presidents from both parties, reappointed time and again because she defended the agency’s independence. McEntarfer didn’t last two before being removed for producing numbers the president disliked.
Don’t let the bastards sneak anything past you. Subscribe and get your daily dose of rage and receipts delivered fresh, before the spin doctors can scrub it.
Ten days later, Trump named her replacement: E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the Heritage Foundation and a formal contributor to Project 2025. Antoni has repeatedly mocked the BLS as a “random number generator” and dismissed its reports as “phony.” Now he’s poised to lead it.
This is more than just a provocative personnel choice. Project 2025, the Heritage-led blueprint for reshaping the federal government, calls for merging the BLS with the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Census Bureau into a single, centrally controlled statistical agency, and for replacing career experts with political appointees.
Congress would need to approve a formal merger, but the groundwork can be laid without a single vote by adjusting the methodologies, reassigning the career staff who guard statistical integrity, and changing the timing or format of releases. Once those levers are in place, the agency’s independence can erode quietly, even while its public brand as the “gold standard” remains intact.
The risk isn’t necessarily blatant fabrication. That would spark an immediate backlash. It’s subtler: shift seasonal adjustments to make employment look stronger, change weighting formulas to understate inflation, delay releases that might damage the administration, or spotlight metrics that flatter the president’s record. The changes would be technical, plausible, and invisible to the casual observer, but they could reshape the public’s perception of the economy.
The four-year term for BLS commissioners was intended as a buffer against political interference. But unlike the Federal Reserve Chair, the commissioner has no legal protection against early removal. The office’s independence has always rested on an unwritten rule: presidents don’t retaliate against the people who produce the numbers. That norm is gone.
McEntarfer’s ouster and Antoni’s nomination fit into a broader pattern: the abandonment of voluntary divestment from business interests, the disregard for the Emoluments Clause, and the installation of agency heads who openly oppose the missions they are tasked with overseeing. This isn’t about one jobs report. It’s about consolidating control over the flow of information, and with it, the narrative that shapes policy, markets, and elections.
We’ve reported extensively on this erosion. See some of the reporting here:
Note: This article is more than 45 days old and now lives in the archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for exclusive perks including full access to all of our 850+ articles.
An independent Bureau of Labor Statistics has been a cornerstone of democratic accountability for more than a century. Eroding that independence won’t just skew next month’s headlines. It risks replacing trusted economic indicators with partisan talking points, leaving the country arguing over whose “truth” to believe.
If the public can no longer trust the data, the ground beneath our economic discourse crumbles, and with it, one more piece of the fragile foundation holding American democracy together.
Because democracy doesn’t defend itself, and neither does your sanity. Subscribe here to keep your eyes open and your sarcasm sharp.
Bibliography:
“Trump Nominates Conservative Economist to Head Agency That Compiles Jobs, Inflation Data.” AP News, August 11, 2025.
“Bureau of Labor Statistics.” Wikipedia.
Erika McEntarfer. Wikipedia.
Kaplan, Thomas, and Laura Reiley. “Trump Nominates Bureau of Labor Statistics Critic to Replace Fired Agency Head.” The Washington Post, August 11, 2025.
Project 2025. Wikipedia.
“Trump Picks Heritage Economist Antoni to Lead US Labor Statistics Agency.” Reuters, August 11, 2025.
“The Jobs Report That Shook the White House.” Time, August 1, 2025.
“Trump Firing of Statistics Chief Puts US Data Credibility at Risk, Experts Warn.” The Guardian, August 4, 2025.
 | A guest post by
|
Absolute insanity. There are simply ZERO reasons to support this regime - none. To do so means to admit you reject the American experiment.
Exactly! Tyranny and despotism in action.