Fool Me Once: Intel Took $8 Billion, Fired Workers, and Now Wants $10 Billion More
The White House plan to buy 10% stake of a private tech company to compete with China is corporate socialism dressed in stars and stripes.
On August 18, 2025, Bloomberg reported that the Trump White House is in talks to acquire a 10% non-voting equity stake in Intel, using up to $10 billion in public money. It’s being pitched as a bold move to reclaim American dominance in semiconductor manufacturing, a national security investment, a taxpayer bet on our own industrial future.
The announcement landed with a dull, familiar thud. Because if you’ve been paying attention, you already know how this goes.
We’ve seen the press releases. We’ve heard the promises. And we’ve watched this exact brand of patriotic capitalism, wrapped in flags and powered by public dollars, deliver something far different than what was sold.
We’re told this is about competing with China. protecting American workers, and reshaping the future of technology. But when the checks get cashed and the factories start closing, it’s always the same: the public takes the risk, and private shareholders reap the reward.
So before we get swept up in the flag-waving, let’s look at how we got here.
Because democracy doesn’t defend itself, and neither does your sanity. Subscribe here to keep your eyes open and your sarcasm sharp.
Remember the CHIPS Act?
In August 2022, President Joe Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act into law, a sweeping $52 billion initiative to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to U.S. soil. In November 2024, just months before Biden left office, the administration awarded Intel up to $7.86 billion in direct funding under the Act, plus a 25% investment tax credit. The announcement was full of promise: tens of thousands of American jobs, revitalized domestic manufacturing, and regional economic booms in Arizona, New Mexico, and Ohio.
Billions In, Jobs Out
By July 2025, Intel confirmed plans to cut 24,000 jobs worldwide, nearly a quarter of its total workforce. That includes both U.S. and international operations, from factories in Oregon and Texas to facilities in Germany, Poland, and Costa Rica. Workers were shown the door while the company, already flush with public money, tightened its margins to keep shareholders happy. It was a quiet betrayal, delivered in boardroom language and dressed up as “operational efficiency.”
And now we’re being told to do it again.
Corporate Socialism, Disguised as Strategy
This time, Intel doesn’t want a grant or tax credit, but a direct financial stake. A $10 billion public investment in a private company that already showed us what it does with public support. We hand them billions. They hand out pink slips.
This isn’t a national strategy. It’s corporate socialism.
And the White House pushing this plan isn’t even pretending otherwise. The same administration that lectures the public about fiscal restraint, that cut food assistance, housing aid, and education support in the name of balancing the budget, suddenly has billions to spare for one of the most powerful corporations on Earth. This is a company that can raise private capital any day of the week.
In fact, just days before this proposed $10 billion public stake hit the headlines, SoftBank, a Japanese investment giant, announced a $2 billion private equity investment in Intel. That’s not a bailout. That’s a bullish bet from one of the most powerful tech funds in the world. Intel clearly isn’t starved for capital. It’s not struggling to attract investors. It just knows that Uncle Sam is a more generous partner with fewer strings attached.
This isn’t about making Intel competitive. This is about underwriting shareholder value with taxpayer dollars.
Leon Pays More Than Intel
Intel’s effective tax rate has hovered between 8% and 12% in recent years, well below what most working Americans pay. Leon, a police officer in Indiana, makes $65,000 a year and pays a higher effective tax rate than Intel. And while Leon watches his local school district lose funding, Intel watches its share price rise, padded by public largesse and cost-saving layoffs.
They say we need this to “compete with China.” However, when China subsidizes its industries, it builds jobs, capacity, and long-term infrastructure. It is a communist nation in which the state controls nearly every aspect of production and maintains almost all jobs in the country. When we do it, we build stock portfolios. Our subsidies turn into executive bonuses, R&D offshoring, and workforce reductions. The jobs we’re promised are conditional, in other nations, temporary, and disappearing the moment the next quarterly earnings report demands it.
You Already Showed Us Who You Are
That’s the most galling part of this new $10 billion plan: we already know how this ends. They showed us. In November, we provided them with funding. In July, they fired our neighbors. Now in August, we’re being asked to double down.
But this isn’t blackjack. It’s people’s lives.
No clawback clause, no oversight mechanism, no stack of enforceable promises will fix the fact that Intel has already shown us who they are. This company, which received billions in public funds, responded with mass layoffs. This is a government that cuts from the poor and gives to the powerful. And this is a system that is morally bankrupt.
Fool Me Twice…
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice? That’s $18 billion in taxpayer giveaways, 24,000 lost jobs, and a nation that keeps confusing wealth with strength. We’re not buying it.
Not this time.
Ask yourself, why is the most corporately-aligned MAGA White House in history suggesting what is likely the first of many corporate socialism schemes? Why is Donald Trump parroting a plan that he would have once called a liberal socialist giveaway? Or in this administration, are we only opposed to social programs that benefit citizens, but not those that prop up corporations?
I didn’t vote for my government to have a stock portfolio. I pay taxes so people can eat, learn, breathe clean air—not so the Treasury Department can try its hand at venture capital. The market is volatile. It's designed to be. But the government shouldn't be. Our democracy isn't a hedge fund.
Don’t let the bastards sneak anything past you. Subscribe and get your daily dose of rage and receipts delivered fresh, before the spin doctors can scrub it.
Source:
"Trump administration vying to own a big stake in Intel after SoftBank's $2 billion bet on company" – Associated Press
"SoftBank Invests $2 Billion in Intel as U.S. Considers Taking 10% Stake in Chip Maker" – Wall Street Journal
"Intel to lay off up to 20% of factory workforce, cutting 10,000 jobs worldwide" – San Francisco Chronicle
"Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes $7.86 Billion CHIPS Incentives Award to Intel" – U.S. Department of Commerce
"Fact Sheet: Two Years After the CHIPS and Science Act" – White House Archives
"What SoftBank, Government Investments Could Mean for Intel's Business—and Stock" – Investopedia
"Intel gets $2 billion lifeline in the form of SoftBank equity investment" – Reuters
"Japanese tech investment giant SoftBank to invest $2 billion in Intel" – Washington Post
"Why Americans Are Right to Be Unhappy About Corporate Tax Avoidance" – ITEP (Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy)
"Intel Corporation Annual Report — Effective Tax Rate Data 2021–2023" – Intel SEC Filings
"Intel is laying off 24,000 employees and retreating from some countries" – The Verge
"Intel to axe 24,000 roles, cancels factory plans in sweeping cost-cutting move" – ITPro
 | A guest post by
|