Part 2! Trump’s Legal House of Cards Collapses: Four Court Defeats in 2 Days
June4th and 5th were not kind to the Trump Administration in court
Earlier today, we reported on the three court cases the Trump administration lost in late May. Now we have even more damaging court days to highlight.
If late May felt like a bad legal week for Donald Trump, June 4th and 5th made it look like a warm-up act.
Just days after federal courts blocked his administration’s tariffs, immigration freezes, and sabotage of public infrastructure, the judiciary struck back again, this time even harder. In one 48-hour span, Trump’s most aggressive plays on education, civic funding, international justice, and immigration were all brought to a grinding halt by the courts.
What unfolded wasn’t just another flurry of legal losses. It was a blistering judicial revolt, and one that sharpened the already growing narrative: Trump’s second-term agenda is repeatedly failing the Constitution’s most basic tests.
This wasn’t judicial overreach. This was the judiciary reasserting its role as the ultimate safeguard against executive abuse.
We just hit 14,000 subscribers—thank you!
Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.
Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.
Case 1: Court Slaps Down Trump’s Political Purge of AmeriCorps
In Thursday’s most notable ruling, a federal judge blocked the Trump administration from defunding AmeriCorps programs in 24 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia. The judge ruled that the cuts violated the Administrative Procedure Act, citing the administration’s failure to follow basic public notice and comment rules.
Quick Context: While often confused with Job Corps—a vocational training program for youth—AmeriCorps places adults in public service roles, from disaster recovery to education support. Earlier this year, Trump moved to dismantle Job Corps nationwide. However, this new attempt to zero out AmeriCorps was far more targeted. The funding cuts impacted only Democratic-led states.
Interestingly, while the states pointed out the partisan nature of the cuts, their legal challenge focused on a narrower and more winnable issue: that the administration failed to follow the required public notice and comment procedures. The court agreed on procedural grounds and didn’t rule on whether the cuts were politically motivated. But the context speaks volumes.
Legal Impact: Reinforces that even the president can’t bypass legal procedure for political payback.
Political Implication: The court is signaling that the executive branch can’t play favorites—or enemies—with federal services.
We reported on the AmeriCorps attacks earlier this Spring. In this article, we focused on the damage to community emergency response.
Case 2: Trump’s War on Education Halted in Court
If Trump hoped to quietly dismantle the Department of Education, a federal court on Wednesday just made that plan a lot louder and a lot harder.
A U.S. district judge issued an emergency injunction blocking the administration’s effort to lay off more than 1,200 employees and consolidate the department’s functions into the Department of Labor. The court ruled that the executive branch lacked the unilateral authority to gut a cabinet-level department created by Congress without legislative approval.
The ruling also ordered the immediate reinstatement of the fired employees, stating that the cuts caused "irreparable institutional harm" and lacked any legitimate statutory justification.
Legal Impact: Affirms that the president cannot dismantle congressionally established departments without explicit authorization from lawmakers.
Political Implication: Highlights the Trump administration’s deeper project of hollowing out federal agencies it ideologically opposes—and the courts’ willingness to push back.
See our previous reporting on attacks on the Department of Education here:
Note: These articles are more than 45 days old and now live in our archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for the full 600+ article archive, exclusive content, and occasional early access.
Case 3: Deporting Without Due Process? Court Says No.
In another blow to Trump’s hardline immigration machine on Wednesday, a federal judge ruled that the administration violated the constitutional rights of 137 Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act.
The deportees, many of whom had fled political repression in Venezuela, were denied basic due process. Instead of receiving hearings or legal representation, they were rounded up and expelled to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison, where many have reportedly faced harsh conditions without trial.
The judge found that the administration’s use of a wartime-era statute to justify these removals “constituted a profound breach of Fifth Amendment protections.”
Legal Impact: Reinforces that even in times of political or security anxiety, constitutional rights are not optional, especially when life and liberty are at stake.
Political Implication: Draws new scrutiny to Trump’s attempt to revive obscure legal tools to bypass immigration norms and raises the specter of a parallel justice system for non-citizens.
We’ve previously reported on CECOT and the deportation policy here:
Note: These articles are more than 45 days old and now live in the archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for full access.
Case 4: Judge Blocks Deportation of Boulder Suspect’s Family
In the most emotionally charged ruling of the day, Wednesday, a federal judge issued an emergency order halting the deportation of the wife and five children of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the man accused in the Boulder, Colorado, firebombing that killed seven.
The Trump administration had moved swiftly to deport the family to Egypt, citing national security concerns. But the judge found the action legally suspect, especially given that the family had not been charged with any crime and faced real danger if returned to a country where dissidents and their relatives are routinely persecuted.
The court emphasized that deporting family members without due process violated both domestic law and international asylum obligations.
Legal Impact: Sets a precedent that the U.S. cannot use guilt by association as justification for deportation without due process.
Political Implication: Reveals how Trump’s immigration enforcement increasingly blurs the line between counterterrorism and collective punishment and how the judiciary is resisting that slide.
The Courts Aren’t Just Speaking. They’re Yelling
June 4 and 5 didn’t just add to Trump’s legal headaches. They marked a sharp escalation in the judiciary’s resistance to a presidency that continues to test the limits of executive power and constitutional patience.
From sabotaging civic programs to deporting families without trial, Trump’s administration has treated legal norms as optional and public institutions as pawns. But the courts, in case after case, are drawing lines, and this time, they’re not budging.
This isn’t judicial activism. It’s constitutional self-defense.
And it’s a reminder that every agency Trump targets, every rule he breaks, and every shortcut he takes will require active, organized resistance —not just in the courts, but also in Congress, in the media, and on the streets.
Call to Action:
If you’ve read this far, you know what’s at stake.
Share this article to spread the word about these rulings.
Call your representatives and demand legislative safeguards for public institutions.
Join our community of readers and organizers committed to defending democracy from the ground up.
We just hit 14,000 subscribers—thank you!
Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.
Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.
Bibliography:
Slisco, Aila. “Donald Trump Suffers Quadruple Legal Blow Within Hours.” Newsweek, June 5, 2025.
“AmeriCorps Must Restore Grant Funding and Members to States That Sued Over Cuts, Federal Judge Rules.” AP News, June 5, 2025.
“Trump Administration Must Restore AmeriCorps Programs in 24 States, Judge Rules.” Reuters, June 5, 2025.
“Trump Cannot Proceed with Gutting US Education Department, Court Rules.” Reuters, June 4, 2025.
“Hundreds of Venezuelans Deported to El Salvador Have Right to Challenge Detention, US Judge Rules.” Reuters, June 4, 2025.
“Federal Judge Says Migrants Sent to El Salvador Must Be Allowed to Challenge Deportations.” AP News, June 4, 2025.
“A US Judge Halts the Deportation of the Egyptian Family of the Boulder Firebombing Suspect.” AP News, June 4, 2025.
“Man Accused of Yelling 'Free Palestine' and Firebombing Demonstrators Charged with Attempted Murder.” AP News, June 5, 2025.
 | A guest post by
|
The Coffman Chronicle screwed up my comment ID. I'm using a cellphone & put in my initials & it sent me to a friend's email, which was put (their initials) over MY comment! One CAN'T argue with the fone, your "AI", to correct this & so, when things are directed to my friends email, it'll just get cancelled out, after going to spam, where it'll be deleted. Good one.
🔥ALL of THIS~ ALL OF IT; were equal brutal actions taken against an individual, from another individual, which would STARVE another person, or DELIBERATELY put the individual(s) in harm's way~ would be considered ASSAULT, AND ASSAULT with intent to kill. This IS ATTEMPTED MURDER, ASSAULT with a deadly weapon &, as the results of past actions show, MURDER.🏡🏘️ People, with NO recourse, are being THROWN OUT INTO THE STREETS to deal with EXTREME WEATHER, & STARVATION!📚 MASS MURDER. WHY isn't this administration, it's individual members- being charged accordingly?☠️
☠️🏘️🔥CHILDREN, BABIES- are dying because of the MURDEROUS GREED of wealthy politicians WHORING OUT for the 🍊🚽!!! 🚽REPUBLICANS, the wealthy who stand to gain financially by prostituting themselves, are GUILTY by association! ☠️🚽☠️ This is NOT METAPHOR!🔥 WHY ISN'T SOMEONE WITH A STRONG VOICE & ACCESS TO THE COURTS, NAMING IT WHAT IT IS???!?!?!!🤡🍊🚽SHOULD BE IN JAIL, having been convicted on 34 counts!
👉With ALL the unCONSTITUTIONAL moves, there is enough evidence to SHOW CLEARLY "ATTEMPTED MURDER & ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON" ARE OBVIOUS TO ALL but the most ignorant!🍊🚽🤖 In addition, that narcissistic sociopath is CLEARLY UNFIT FOR ANY OFFICE IN THE LAND!🗽LASTLY, but not least, it should be noted & underlined; THAT though the SPINELESS REPUBLICANS assume they will profit greatly by selling their souls; having their (the general population) backs against the wall & NOTHING LEFT TO LOSE~ THOSE Republicans will be ANYTHING BUT 'SAFE'! 🌬️🌊 "BEWARE THE FURY OF THE QUIET MAN"!