7 Comments
User's avatar
Brett basco's avatar

Poli

And then politicians should not be in charge of any kind of science research that should be scientist. Only Trump is not a scientist. He’s not even a good politician. He should not be in charge of anything to deal with the science sorry.

David Maceira's avatar

AI has an identical impact on resources i.e. land, water, power, infrastructure etc. as crypto. But like many disruptive technologies they have boom and bust cycles. There's a bubble coming. The bad part is the taxpayers are going to get stuck with bailing out billionaires. Again.

Iconoclast's avatar

If this project gives us the same rigorous level of scientific inquiry as our Department of Health and Human Services ….

Dwight Homer's avatar

We have already seen Musk and this administration wreak havoc on government agencies. Now we are seeing wholesale destruction of medical research and basic research in the nation’s premier institutions. Genesis smells of oligarchy. Beware the temptations of speed and ambition minus responsibility.

Marie Riverton's avatar

You are exactly right. It would be easy (we've seen it with Grok) to program and train to produce convenient results, and call it proof.

Rainer's avatar

The government is acting like the “sorcerer's apprentice” in Goethe's poem.

I am also convinced that this will mark the end of independent science, even though I know that dependencies already exist.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Dec 21
Comment removed
Marie Riverton's avatar

Thank you, Jordan. How interesting! I'll dig in