The Streisand Effect: How Hiding the Epstein Files Backfired Spectacularly
Congress tried to bury the truth. The media looked away. Now the internet is on fire with questions they can’t ignore.
In 2003, Barbara Streisand tried to suppress a photograph of her Malibu home from a coastal erosion study. It was image #3850 in an archive of over 12,000 aerial shots, utterly obscure until she sued the photographer. Before the lawsuit, that photo had been downloaded exactly six times. After the lawsuit? Over 420,000 views in under a month.
That’s how the Streisand Effect was born, when an attempt to hide information only makes it explode across the public consciousness.
Fast-forward to 2025, and America’s most powerful institutions—Congress, the Department of Justice, and the corporate media—seem to have forgotten that lesson. Or maybe they remembered it and just didn’t care. Either way, they’re paying for it.
When lawmakers quietly postponed a vote on unsealing the Epstein files before skipping town for summer recess, they thought they were killing the story. Instead, they turned it into a wildfire. Search interest for “Epstein” surged by over 1,200% in one week. Hashtags like #ReleaseTheList and #EpsteinFiles trended globally. Media outlets scrambled to play catch-up after days of silence. And regular people—those supposedly too distracted, too divided, or too exhausted to care—started asking very loud questions.
What are they hiding?
Who are they protecting?
Why now?
They figured the public would be too distracted by gas prices and culture wars to care. Instead, we lit a match.
This wasn’t just another scandal swept under the rug. This was an attempted erasure that backfired so badly it set off alarms across every corner of the internet. And the more the public searched, the more obvious it became that the silence wasn’t accidental; it was systemic.
Because this is what happens in the modern age: information doesn’t disappear when you suppress it. It metastasizes. It replicates. It radicalizes. What Streisand accidentally taught the world is now a permanent feature of our digital reality: if you want to bury the truth, you'd better dig a damn deep hole, because the internet comes with a shovel.
And the Epstein files?
They just got exhumed.
Want to Know Your Rights?
Download a free digital copy of the U.S. Constitution—the same document Trump is trying to bulldoze. Learn exactly what he's breaking… and how to fight back.
📬 Stay Informed. Stay Loud.
Subscribe to The Coffman Chronicle for no-BS political analysis, action guides, and weekly truth bombs you won’t get from corporate media.
What They Tried to Bury
Let’s be clear: the Epstein files aren’t just documents. They’re potential detonators.
These sealed records include flight logs, deposition transcripts, civil suit evidence, internal memos, and names—lots of names. Politicians. Billionaires. Media moguls. Royalty. Tech giants. They don’t just paint a picture of Jeffrey Epstein’s network; they trace the architecture of an entire ecosystem of power, privilege, and protection.
So when Congress ducked out before voting to release them? It wasn’t about timing. It was about shielding. And it’s not the first time.
Flight Logs That Don’t Lie
The “Lolita Express” logs—Epstein’s private jet flight manifests—have been the subject of legal wrangling and redaction for years. The versions that have emerged so far show a mix of high-profile names, including:
Bill Clinton (26 times)
Donald Trump (not officially logged, but photographed with Epstein and mentioned in testimony)
Prince Andrew
Kevin Spacey
Naomi Campbell
Alan Dershowitz
Some of these individuals deny wrongdoing. But the public isn’t asking for guilt by association. They’re asking why those associations were sealed in the first place.
Civil Suits and Sealed Testimony
Multiple survivors, including Virginia Giuffre and Maria Farmer, have named names under oath. Many of their statements were buried in civil settlements or gagged by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
In a 2015 bombshell case, Giuffre named high-profile individuals in a lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell and Alan Dershowitz. The records were sealed. When those documents were briefly unsealed in 2019, after Epstein’s “suicide”, the public got a glimpse of what was inside: allegations of abuse, witness tampering, threats, and involvement by unnamed “government officials.”
Even then, a judge re-sealed most of the records again pending “further review.”
Notably, in 2019, Virginia Giuffre made a chilling statement that continues to haunt online discourse:
“If something happens to me—it’s not suicide.”
A warning, not a confession. And a reminder that those speaking out about Epstein often face consequences long before the public sees justice.
DOJ, FBI, and the Infamous “No Client List” Memo
In July 2025, the Department of Justice released a brief memo aimed at quelling speculation. It declared, flatly, that there is “no client list.” That claim contradicted years of investigative reporting, sworn testimony, and internal agency memos obtained by journalists and legal teams.
Here’s what we know:
In 2008, Epstein cut a secret non-prosecution deal with Alex Acosta’s U.S. Attorney’s Office that protected “unnamed co-conspirators.”
That same year, the FBI had already compiled extensive lists of Epstein’s contacts and frequent guests, according to internal reports revealed in FOIA lawsuits.
Multiple media outlets, including ABC and the Miami Herald, had access to those names but didn’t publish them.
So if there’s no “client list,” what exactly did all those lawyers, judges, and journalists see and seal?
The Power of a Redaction
The issue isn’t just who flew on a plane. It’s who got protected. Names redacted. Depositions sealed. Grand juries blocked.
Every black bar hides more than a name; it hides a relationship. A decision. A debt.
The Epstein files aren’t buried because they’re irrelevant. They’re buried because they are radioactive, and the people closest to them have spent the last two decades investing in silence.
But silence doesn’t last forever.
Because now, thanks to botched suppression, public pressure, and the raw power of the internet, those files are being searched, scrutinized, and demanded like never before.
And the people who worked so hard to keep them in the dark? They’re starting to sweat in the spotlight.
The Attempted Erasure
If you want to kill a story in Washington, you don’t shred documents anymore. You schedule a vote, postpone it quietly, then adjourn for recess and let the media change the subject. That’s exactly what Congress did when it came time to consider releasing the Epstein files.
No debate. No vote. No accountability.
Instead, lawmakers scattered for their summer vacations, leaving the public with sealed names, half-truths, and a trail of redactions. It wasn’t just a dodge. It was a deliberate act of institutional cowardice.
And it wasn’t limited to Congress.
Congress Kills the Clock, Not the Curiosity
House leadership reportedly shelved the unsealing vote just days before recess, citing “procedural complications.” Translation: they didn’t want it on record. No one wanted to be the “aye” or “nay” attached to blowing the lid off one of the most politically volatile documents in modern history.
Speaker Mike Johnson gave a press conference about Congressional ethics the same week, complaining that lawmakers didn’t get a cost-of-living pay increase. Not a word about the Epstein files. Not a word about transparency. Just more empty talk about “serving the people” while actively shielding predators from sunlight.
The DOJ’s Shrug and the Media’s Disappearing Act
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice released a memo so brazenly dismissive that it practically dared the public to riot. It declared, with finality, that there is “no client list.” Nothing to see here. Go home. The end.
Except it wasn’t the end. Because that memo contradicted years of legal filings, FOIA documents, survivor testimony, and even internal FBI reports.
How can there be no list when civil suits, depositions, and intelligence briefings refer to known associates and “frequent flyers”?
The public saw the contradiction. And it caught fire.
But the mainstream press? They blinked. Then looked away.
Cable news, editorial boards, and legacy outlets treated the Epstein file controversy like background noise. They covered the DOJ memo days late, if at all. Some buried the story under softer headlines—“DOJ Clarifies Epstein Details”—as if clarifying and concealing were the same thing.
And this isn't the first time. In 2015, ABC News anchor Amy Robach was caught on a hot mic lamenting that her Epstein story—with interviews, photos, and names—was squashed by network higher-ups. That footage was leaked in 2019 by Project Veritas. Robach said:
“I’ve had this interview with Virginia Giuffre. We would not put it on the air. First of all, I was told, ‘Who’s Jeffrey Epstein?’... Then the Palace found out we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways.”
Let that sink in. They had the receipts. They buried the story.
Silence Was the Strategy. The Internet Wasn’t Having It.
This was never about lack of evidence. It was about orchestrating the delay, about powerful people in suits pulling levers to ensure one thing: That justice never outpaces influence.
But that strategy had a fatal flaw. It relied on people not paying attention.
This time, they were watching.
This time, they were searching.
This time, they weren’t waiting for CNN to tell them what mattered.
When the DOJ shrugs, Congress ducks, and the media ghosts the story, it’s no coincidence. It’s choreography. But the moves are sloppy now. The pattern’s been exposed. And millions of people are starting to see it for what it is:
It is a cover-up with too many fingerprints.
Media Silence: A Tale of Two Scandals
If the Epstein files had been a laptop left at a repair shop in Delaware, you would’ve heard about it every day for the past two years.
If it had been an email server in Chappaqua? There’d be congressional hearings, wall-to-wall coverage, and a countdown clock on CNN.
But because the Epstein files contain elite names from both parties, multiple countries, and multiple billion-dollar industries, the story hasn’t just been soft-pedaled—it’s been smothered.
How the Media Treats “Acceptable” Scandals
Let’s look at the coverage record:
Hillary Clinton’s emails: Over 100 front-page stories in the New York Times alone in the final six weeks before the 2016 election.
Hunter Biden’s laptop: Wall-to-wall airtime across right-wing media and a scramble for “balance” across mainstream outlets in 2020 and 2024.
Stormy Daniels: Entire news cycles dominated by salacious quotes and minor filings.
Even Taylor Swift’s political endorsements have made national headlines with more consistency than anything tied to Epstein’s sealed files.
These scandals—real or not—were considered safe to cover. They were partisan, predictable, and ultimately profitable.
But the Epstein files? They’re dangerous to the system itself.
Because they don’t just threaten one party, or one celebrity, or one news cycle.
They threaten the whole damn scaffolding.
What Happens When a Scandal Is “Too Big”
The story of Epstein has been actively buried, delayed, or redirected for over 15 years. But nowhere is that clearer than in the mainstream media’s disappearing act.
In 2015, ABC’s Amy Robach recorded an off-air confession during a hot mic moment. Her network had a full interview with survivor Virginia Giuffre. It included allegations against Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and others.
That clip didn’t go viral because ABC aired it. It went viral because Project Veritas leaked it in 2019.
A major U.S. network had documented allegations of sex trafficking involving a royal, a lawyer, and a billionaire, and they shelved it for “editorial reasons.”
That’s not journalism. That’s complicity.
When the story threatens the powerful, the presses stop printing and start protecting.
Even Now, They’re Hiding in Plain Sight
In July 2025, when search interest in “Epstein” spiked over 1,200%, most mainstream outlets didn’t respond until days later, and even then, they downplayed it.
CNN covered the DOJ memo as a “clarification.” The New York Times ran a story about "ongoing public speculation." MSNBC focused on Trump’s rally crowd size that same night.
Compare that to how those same outlets treated Clinton’s emails, with chyron panic and breathless speculation over “classified markings.”
The hypocrisy is clinical. The avoidance is loud.
They Didn’t Just Miss the Story. They Helped Bury It
The media didn’t fail to break the Epstein story.
They broke it and then locked it in a drawer.
They had the victims.
They had the documents.
They had the footage.
And they looked the other way.
Not because it wasn’t news.
But because it was too real to print.
The Streisand Effect Ignites
They wanted silence.
What they got was a search spike that scorched the internet.
In the days after Congress quietly postponed the vote to unseal the Epstein files, search interest for “Epstein” exploded by over 1,200%, according to Google Trends. On TikTok, videos tagged with #EpsteinList garnered over 200 million views in just a few days. Twitter (now X) trended with hashtags like:
#ReleaseTheList
#WhoDidEpsteinKnow
#UnsealEverything
#EpsteinFiles
Reddit forums lit up. Independent journalists dropped videos, podcasts, and timelines. Even casual users started digging through archived flight logs, re-analyzing court documents, and circulating survivor interviews that mainstream media long ignored.
What Congress and the DOJ tried to delay didn’t just become visible.
It became viral.
They Lit the Fuse
By refusing to release the files, officials didn’t suppress the story; they supercharged it.
This is the Streisand Effect in its purest form:
An attempt to hide sensitive or damaging information
Triggers massive public interest
Ends up amplifying the very thing they tried to bury
The more they said, “There’s nothing here,” the louder people screamed, “Then show us.”
The harder they tried to downplay it, the more people started asking who benefits from the silence.
The Public Became the Press
The mainstream media’s tepid response only fueled the fire.
With no leadership from traditional outlets, the internet filled the void.
TikTok creators began narrating Epstein’s timeline
YouTubers posted breakdowns of the DOJ’s redactions
Independent journalists released FOIA requests in real time
Digital artists created viral infographics of the “web of connections” Epstein maintained
People weren’t waiting for permission anymore. They were reclaiming the investigation.
This wasn’t “conspiracy theorists” in their basement. This was the new face of citizen journalism, and it was pissed.
Real-Time Evidence of Outrage
Here’s what the data said:
Google search traffic for “Epstein client list” was the #1 breakout query in the U.S. the day after the vote was shelved
Twitter activity around “Epstein” increased by 1,000% compared to the prior week
The keyword “unseal” hit its highest peak since 2019
Even ChatGPT usage spiked with questions like:
“What’s in the Epstein files?”
“Why did Congress delay the vote?”
“Who’s on the list?”
In trying to suppress the fire, they poured gasoline on it.
This Is Bigger Than a Trend. It’s a Turning Point
The Epstein backlash isn’t a flash in the pan. It’s not just about voyeuristic curiosity or partisan point-scoring.
It’s about trust. Transparency. Trauma. And the people’s right to the truth.
They told us: There’s nothing to see here. But people looked anyway, and they didn’t like what they found.
What they saw wasn’t just Epstein’s crimes. It was the entire machine protecting him.
Information Suppression in the Internet Age
There was a time when you could kill a story by ignoring it. That time is over.
For decades, power operated on a simple equation: control the flow of information, and you control the narrative. If the press doesn’t run it, the public doesn’t hear it. If the records are sealed, the facts don’t exist. If the people asking questions are discredited, the issue dies quietly.
That equation broke the moment the internet grew teeth.
Gatekeepers Are Now Just Speed Bumps
The Epstein case is the most high-profile example of this fracture, but it’s not the first.
The Pentagon Papers only reached the public because Daniel Ellsberg defied the system.
Julian Assange and WikiLeaks demonstrated that even the most sensitive intelligence can be extracted from vaults and made public.
Edward Snowden proved that whistleblowers can bypass the press entirely and reach millions overnight.
These moments didn’t just change how we view government. They shattered the illusion that secrecy equals safety.
Social Media Is Now the Primary Press
Today, an 18-year-old with a smartphone can break news faster than a 50-year-old editor with a Rolodex. A TikTok timeline can educate more people in 30 seconds than a newspaper can reach in 3 days. A meme is more enduring than a press release.
The institutions still think they can stall for time. Delay the vote. Wait out the outrage. Hope the next news cycle saves them.
But in the internet age, every delay is a spark, and the public is holding matches.
The Illusion of Control Has Crumbled
You can’t contain information in the digital age. You can only choose how badly it backfires when you try.
The Streisand Effect is no longer just a PR problem. It’s a systems failure. The more you try to suppress something — especially something as damning and wide-reaching as the Epstein files — the more you validate public suspicion.
You tell people the story doesn’t matter. They assume it’s the most important thing in the world.
You tell them there’s nothing to hide. They know someone’s hiding everything.
The Old Playbook Is Dead
Redact, distract, delay — it’s not working anymore.
People are too online. Too skeptical. Too networked. Too pissed off.
And now, with the Epstein scandal smoldering across every platform, the message is clear: You can still try to hide the truth, but you’ll never own it again.
The Psychology of Being Lied To
Here’s the thing about suppression: it doesn’t just hide the truth. It tells the public that the truth is dangerous.
And when people sense danger wrapped in silence, they don’t look away. They look harder.
Forbidden Fruit Hits Different
Psychologists call it “reactance”, the instinctive resistance that kicks in when we feel our freedom to know, choose, or access information is being threatened.
It’s why teenagers sneak out the moment their parents say “no.” It’s why banned books fly off library shelves. It’s why a sealed court document gets more clicks than an unsealed one ever could.
The minute the DOJ said, “There is no client list,” millions of people read that as: “There’s a client list and they don’t want you to see it.”
Even if that wasn’t the intent, that’s how it landed. Because when institutions lie — or sound like they’re lying—they don’t just lose trust. They lose the benefit of the doubt.
Secrecy + Power = Suspicion
Secrecy by itself doesn’t always breed outrage. Secrecy combined with power always does.
When everyday people are told they can’t access information that directly affects public safety, criminal justice, or elite corruption, it sends a message: You’re not important enough to know.
That hits deeper than curiosity. That’s personal. It’s one thing to lie. It’s another to lie and act like you’re entitled to do it.
The Epstein cover-up doesn’t just offend sensibilities; it offends identity. It says: You are not part of this club. You do not deserve the truth. Sit down and move on.
People don’t move on from that. They mobilize.
Gaslighting Turns Silence Into Fire
The worst part?
This isn't just about secrecy. It’s about contradiction.
Victims say there’s a list.
Flight logs exist.
Civil suits reference powerful people.
And the government says… none of that is real?
That’s not denial. That’s gaslighting. And when people realize they’re being gaslit, they don’t just doubt the story; they start to doubt everything.
Secrecy Doesn’t Quiet Us. It Radicalizes Us.
This is the final stage of the Streisand Effect. You didn’t just fail to hide something. You told people they couldn’t be trusted with it.
Now they want it more than ever. Not just for curiosity. For justice. For dignity. For proof that someone, somewhere, can’t just buy silence with status.
And if they don’t get it?
They’ll tear down every redaction until the truth screams through.
Who Gains from Silence?
Secrecy is never neutral.
It’s not random. It’s not accidental. And it sure as hell isn’t for our protection.
Every document sealed, every file delayed, every name redacted benefits someone.
So let’s ask the question none of the press briefings, legal memos, or Congressional leaders want to answer: Who benefits from keeping the Epstein files sealed?
The Politicians with Ties to Epstein
Let’s start in Congress. Several sitting and former lawmakers have confirmed or alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein, whether through travel, donor networks, or known associates.
Bill Clinton: Flew on Epstein’s plane at least 26 times, according to flight records. Denies wrongdoing, but never fully explained the volume of travel.
Donald Trump: Pictured with Epstein repeatedly, praised him as “a terrific guy” in 2002, and was accused in a 1994 lawsuit (later dropped) of raping a minor at an Epstein-linked party.
Prince Andrew: Sued by Virginia Giuffre. Settled. Never charged criminally.
These are not fringe names. These are men with massive institutional influence. Presidents. Princes. Power players.
And that’s just what’s public.
The Courts That Sealed, Stalled, and Looked Away
Judges blocked public access to key Epstein documents
Civil suits stayed sealed “pending further review.”
One Florida judge refused to unseal Epstein’s original plea deal
The result? Survivors silenced. Public misled. Predators protected.
The judiciary was supposed to be a firewall. Instead, it became part of the firewall keeping names in the dark.
The DOJ, FBI, and the “No List” Lie
The 2008 non-prosecution deal protected unnamed co-conspirators
FOIA-released FBI docs show Epstein’s known network
DOJ in 2025 claims: “There is no client list.”
If that’s true, then the DOJ has just contradicted the FBI, court filings, and sworn testimony. If it’s false, then they’ve just lied to the public during a constitutional scandal.
Either way? Someone is obstructing justice.
The Billionaire Class Behind the Curtain
These aren’t just rumors. These are transactions.
Les Wexner: Gave Epstein financial power of attorney. Epstein managed Wexner’s money and bought real estate through Wexner’s entities.
Leon Black: Paid Epstein $150 million between 2012–2017 for “tax and estate planning.” Black later admitted the payments but claimed he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal behavior.
Alan Dershowitz: Sued and accused. Denies wrongdoing. Actively fought to keep certain Epstein-related documents sealed in multiple cases.
These aren’t bystanders. They’re the architects of silence.
They didn’t just benefit from Epstein’s services. They helped build the fortress that kept him insulated for decades.
Silence Isn’t a Strategy. It’s a Service.
Every redaction is an act of protection. Every stall in court is a favor. Every quiet press release, a payoff.
These people didn’t just get lucky. They got help. From institutions. From law enforcement. From the media. From politicians.
And if someone went that far to hide their name? That’s probably the name we need most.
What Happens Next And What Can Be Done
This is the part where they’re hoping you burn out. They think you’ll move on, that the algorithm will swallow your outrage and feed you back cat videos and campaign ads.
But they’re wrong, because now we know, and once you see the machine, you can’t unsee it.
The Epstein files don’t just reveal individual monsters. They reveal a system of protection, and the people who built it are still in power.
So here’s what comes next: You break the silence before it breaks you.
DEMAND UNSEALING LOUDLY AND PUBLICLY
Congress didn’t vote on the release of the Epstein file. Make them.
Start with these two committees:
House Judiciary Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
Then contact your representative and ask why the hell they recessed without a vote.
Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121
Tell them:
“I’m calling to demand a full public vote on the unsealing of the Epstein files. No more delays. No more excuses. The public has a right to know who was protected.”
Send it by phone.
Send it by email.
Send it on social media and tag them until they can’t hide.
ORGANIZE AROUND TRANSPARENCY
Support watchdog groups that are filing FOIA suits, tracking sealed documents, and applying pressure:
Judicial Watch
Public Citizen
Government Accountability Project
OpenTheEpsteinFiles.org (fictional for now, but maybe not for long)
Coordinate with local organizers. Ask your city or state reps to file public record requests tied to Epstein’s network, especially if there are local figures with known connections.
Don’t just talk. Organize. They’re counting on chaos. Give them coordination instead.
DON’T LET THE MEDIA OFF THE HOOK
The corporate press buried this story for years. Now they’re pretending they “missed it” or “need more verification.”
Bullshit.
Email editors.
Tag journalists.
Flood op-ed pages.
Write your own.
Force the question into their coverage meetings:
“Why haven’t you covered the Epstein file vote?”
“Why did you kill your own investigation in 2015?”
“Who are you still protecting?”
They ignored it for a reason.
Make silence the more painful option.
KEEP THE FIRE HOT
The Streisand Effect works because people refuse to shut up.
That means:
Keep posting
Keep sharing survivor interviews
Keep tracking FOIA results
Keep talking about it even when they don’t want you to
Keep screaming until redactions become revelations
The institutions are watching. The elites are sweating. And the machine is glitching under the pressure of exposure.
Now’s not the time to pause. It’s the time to push — hard.
You’re Not Just Demanding Names. You’re Demanding Justice.
The Epstein files aren’t just about what happened. They’re about who got away with it.
And if you let this moment pass, they’ll get away with it again. But if you organize, expose, and demand with fire in your gut?
They’re not walking away this time. Not clean. Not quietly. Not protected.
You Can’t Kill the Truth
They sealed the files.
They redacted the names.
They stalled the vote.
They told you to move on.
And it backfired.
They thought they could control the story.
Instead, they created a movement.
They thought redactions would bury the past.
Instead, they resurrected it.
They thought silence would keep them safe.
But silence only made the public louder, meaner, and unrelenting.
You can’t kill the truth.
You can delay it.
Discredit it.
Buy it time with money, lawyers, and fear.
But the truth doesn’t go away.
It waits.
It smolders.
And when the spark hits, it burns down everything they built to contain it.
This isn’t just about Epstein.
It’s about a system that protects predators and punishes survivors.
It’s about politicians who lie with a straight face.
It’s about media giants who smother stories with a smile.
It’s about you, and whether you’ll let them get away with it again.
Because if they can do this and we let them?
They’ll do worse.
And we’ll never see it coming.
So don’t stop searching.
Don’t stop shouting.
Don’t stop fighting.
Because the moment they tried to hide the truth?
They handed it to us.
And now?
It belongs to the people.
Oligarch Watch at The Coffman Chronicle is powered by YOU— no billionaires, no media moguls, no corporate puppeteers. We’re here to expose their BS, break down their schemes, and shine a light on the growing billionaire takeover.
Bibliography:
“How Barbra Streisand Inspired the ‘Streisand Effect.’” Mental Floss, August 17, 2023.
“Streisand effect.” Wikipedia, last modified July 2025.
“Anchor Caught on Tape Claiming ABC News Suppressed Epstein Story.” Axios, November 5, 2019.
“Amy Robach (Wikipedia).” Wikipedia, last modified July 2025.
“An ABC News Anchor Was Caught on a Hot Mic Saying Her Network Killed Her 2015 Exposé of Jeffrey Epstein.” Business Insider, November 5, 2019.
The congress is corrupted. The Epstein files are there. Trump and Bondi and Patel are corupt.
This is it!! Don't let them look away. This is the thing that can break their grip on us. They are divided. We need to use the powerful who hold our view to take them down. Then we, as a united people, can steer our own course. Always remember that the powerful taking down the powerful can't be trusted either.